in Re: Daniel James Sixta
This text of in Re: Daniel James Sixta (in Re: Daniel James Sixta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 25, 2007.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-06-01108-CV
IN RE DANIEL JAMES SIXTA, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On December 13, 2006, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asked this court to compel the Harris County District Clerk to transmit a copy of his application for habeas corpus and related documents to the Court of Criminal Appeals.
We do not have jurisdiction to issue the relief relator requests. We accordingly dismiss relator=s petition for writ of mandamus for lack of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
Petition Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 25, 2007.
Panel consists of Justices Yates, Anderson, and Hudson.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Daniel James Sixta, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-daniel-james-sixta-texapp-2007.