In Re: Daniel J. Moos v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re: Daniel J. Moos v. the State of Texas (In Re: Daniel J. Moos v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DENIED and Opinion Filed August 14, 2023
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-23-00567-CV
IN RE DANIEL J. MOOS, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 160th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-20-17668
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Reichek, Smith, and Kennedy Opinion by Justice Kennedy Before the Court is relator’s June 7, 2023 petition for writ of mandamus.
Relator asks this Court to compel the trial court to (1) vacate its May 12, 2023 order
denying relator’s motion to disburse funds from the registry of the court and
(2) order that the interpleaded funds be immediately paid to relator.
Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court
clearly abused its discretion and that relator lacks an adequate appellate remedy. In
re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig.
proceeding). After reviewing relator’s petition and the record before us, we conclude
that relator has failed to demonstrate entitlement to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P.
52.8(a).
/Nancy Kennedy/ NANCY KENNEDY JUSTICE
230567F.P05
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re: Daniel J. Moos v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-daniel-j-moos-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.