in Re Daniel J. Canterbury
This text of in Re Daniel J. Canterbury (in Re Daniel J. Canterbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
|
|
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 2-10-110-CV
IN RE DANIEL J. CANTERBURY RELATOR
------------
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]
The court has received an amended nunc pro tunc order dated April 15, 2010, which deletes the civil contempt provision that appeared on page 9 of the February 19, 2010 order holding Relator in contempt. Accordingly, in light of the amended nunc pro tunc order of April 15, 2010, Relator=s alternative request for mandamus relief in his APetition For Writ Of Habeas Corpus@ is hereby denied as moot, and our April 9, 2010 stay order concerning this portion of Relator=s requested mandamus relief is ordered dissolved.
Having previously denied in our April 9, 2010 order all other relief sought by Relator, we have now disposed of all issues presented to us by Relator=s April 8, 2010 APetition For Writ Of Habeas Corpus.@
Relator shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let execution issue.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: WALKER and MCCOY, JJ.
DELIVERED: April 21, 2010
[1] See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Daniel J. Canterbury, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-daniel-j-canterbury-texapp-2010.