in Re Daniel Harris

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 1, 2014·No. 01-13-00873-CR·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued May 1, 2014.

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

Court of Criminal Appeals, and complied with a clerk’s duties in a criminal proceeding.1 This Court does not have jurisdiction to grant relator’s requested relief. By statute, we have the authority only to issue a writ of mandamus against a district court judge or a county court judge within the Court’s jurisdiction, and may issue all writs necessary to enforce this Court’s appellate jurisdiction. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(a)–(b) (West 2004). We have no jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a district clerk except to protect our jurisdiction. In re Smith, 263 S.W.3d 93, 94 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, orig. proceeding) (citing In re Washington, 7 S.W.3d 181, 182 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, orig. proceeding)).

Moreover, we have no authority to issue writs of mandamus in criminal law matters pertaining to proceedings under Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 11.07. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07, § 3(a), (b) (West Supp. 2013); In re Briscoe, 230 S.W.3d 196, 196–97 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2006, orig. proceeding); see also In re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d 715, 717 (Tex. App.— Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding) (noting that only Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction in final post-conviction felony proceedings).

1 Harris’s petition indicates that the underlying proceeding is cause number 1204054-A, styled Ex parte Daniel Harris, in the 182nd District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Jeannine Barr presiding.

Conclusion

Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus for lack of jurisdiction. We dismiss all pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Sharp. Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Daniel Harris, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

in Re Daniel Harris (in Re Daniel Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Briscoe
230 S.W.3d 196 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2006)
In Re Smith
263 S.W.3d 93 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2006)
In Re Washington
7 S.W.3d 181 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1999)
In Re McAfee
53 S.W.3d 715 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2001)