In re Daniel H.
665 A.2d 606, 235 Conn. 913, 1995 Conn. LEXIS 368
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 14912) is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Does General Statutes § 46-127, as amended by § 6 (d) of No. 94-2 of the 1994 Public Acts, July Special Session, apply to the transfer from the juvenile docket to the adult docket in this case?
“2. If the answer to the first question is yes, does that application constitute an ex post facto law in violation of either the federal or state constitution?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Daniel H., 665 A.2d 606, 235 Conn. 913, 1995 Conn. LEXIS 368 (Colo. 1995).
665 A.2d 606 (In re Daniel H.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Daniel H.
678 A.2d 462 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1996)