In Re Daniel Byron Cady, Debtor, Jeffrey Palm Danielle Lynn Scapparo v. Daniel Byron Cady William A. Klapperman Alfred Siegel
315 F.3d 1121, 2003 Daily Journal DAR 143, 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 93, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 29
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 3, 2003·No. 01-56735·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinions
OPINION
We affirm the judgment of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, for reasons stated in its opinion, Palm v. Klapperman (In re Cady), 266 B.R. 172 (B.A.P.2001). We reprint that opinion as an appendix hereto.
AFFIRMED.
Opinion by Judge CANBY; Dissent by Judge BERZON.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re Daniel Byron Cady, Debtor, Jeffrey Palm Danielle Lynn Scapparo v. Daniel Byron Cady William A. Klapperman Alfred Siegel, 315 F.3d 1121, 2003 Daily Journal DAR 143, 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 93, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 29 (9th Cir. 2003).
315 F.3d 1121 (In Re Daniel Byron Cady, Debtor, Jeffrey Palm Danielle Lynn Scapparo v. Daniel Byron Cady William A. Klapperman Alfred Siegel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Richter
525 B.R. 735 (C.D. California, 2015)