In Re Daniel Byron Cady, Debtor, Jeffrey Palm Danielle Lynn Scapparo v. Daniel Byron Cady William A. Klapperman Alfred Siegel
315 F.3d 1121, 2003 Daily Journal DAR 143, 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 93, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 29
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 3, 2003
Docket01-56735
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 315 F.3d 1121 (In Re Daniel Byron Cady, Debtor, Jeffrey Palm Danielle Lynn Scapparo v. Daniel Byron Cady William A. Klapperman Alfred Siegel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In Re Daniel Byron Cady, Debtor, Jeffrey Palm Danielle Lynn Scapparo v. Daniel Byron Cady William A. Klapperman Alfred Siegel, 315 F.3d 1121, 2003 Daily Journal DAR 143, 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 93, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 29 (9th Cir. 2003).
Opinions
OPINION
We affirm the judgment of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, for reasons stated in its opinion, Palm v. Klapperman (In re Cady), 266 B.R. 172 (B.A.P.2001). We reprint that opinion as an appendix hereto.
AFFIRMED.
Opinion by Judge CANBY; Dissent by Judge BERZON.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In re Richter
525 B.R. 735 (C.D. California, 2015)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
315 F.3d 1121, 2003 Daily Journal DAR 143, 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 93, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 29, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-daniel-byron-cady-debtor-jeffrey-palm-danielle-lynn-scapparo-v-ca9-2003.