In Re Daniecki
183 A. 298, 119 N.J. Eq. 359, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 622
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes, and reported in 117 N. J. Eq. 527.
For affirmance —The Chief-Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 12.
For reversal —None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re Daniecki, 183 A. 298, 119 N.J. Eq. 359, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 622 (N.J. 1936).
183 A. 298 (In Re Daniecki) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State ex rel. M.C.
894 A.2d 60 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2006)
Peyton v. Nord
437 P.2d 716 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1968)
State v. Monahan
104 A.2d 21 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1954)
Order of Filiation v. El
60 A.2d 893 (Hudson County Superior Court, 1948)
In Re Mei
186 A. 577 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1936)