In re Danastorg

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Danastorg

784 A.2d 72, 170 N.J. 72, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 1404

DecidedNovember 16, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 784 A.2d 72 (In re Danastorg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Danastorg, 784 A.2d 72, 170 N.J. 72, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 1404 (N.J. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 00-194/195 concluding that STEPHEN DANASTORG of MARLTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1994, should be reprimanded for violating R. 1:21-1(a) (failure to maintain bona fide office) and RPC 5.5(a) (practice of law in a [73]*73jurisdiction where doing so violates the regulation of the legal profession in that jurisdiction);

And the Disciplinary Review Board having concluded that the charge of violating RPC 1.16(a)(1) in the Yackel matter should be dismissed;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that STEPHEN DANASTORG is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the charge of violation of RPC 1.16(a)(1) in the Yackel matter is dismissed for lack of clear and convincing evidence; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI