In re Dana Paul

194 A.3d 386

Opinion

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the certified order of the Court of Appeals of Maryland suspending respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction for thirty days; this court's July 19, 2018, order directing respondent to show cause why reciprocal discipline should not be imposed; and the statement of Disciplinary Counsel; and it appearing that respondent failed to file a response to the court's show cause order but did file his D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g) affidavit on August 2, 2018, it is

ORDERED that Dana A. Paul is hereby suspended from the practice of law in this jurisdiction for a period of thirty days nunc pro tunc to August 2, 2018. See In re Sibley , 990 A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010) ; In re Fuller , 930 A.2d 194 , 198 (D.C. 2007) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate).