In Re Dana Lauren Tapper

199 A.3d 1159
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided January 17, 2019·No. 18-BG-1127·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the certified order revoking respondent's right to practice law in the state of Virginia by consent; this court's October 29, 2018, order suspending respondent pending resolution of this matter and directing her to show cause why the functionally equivalent reciprocal discipline of disbarment should not be imposed; and the statement of Disciplinary Counsel; and it appearing that respondent has failed to file a response to the court's order or file her required D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g) affidavit, it is

ORDERED that Dana Lauren Tapper is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. See In re Sibley , 990 A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010) ; In re Fuller , 930 A.2d 194 , 198 (D.C. 2007) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement the period of respondent's disbarment will not begin to run until such time as she files a D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g) affidavit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Dana Lauren Tapper, 199 A.3d 1159 (D.C. 2019).

199 A.3d 1159 (In Re Dana Lauren Tapper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Sibley
990 A.2d 483 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2010)
In Re Fuller
930 A.2d 194 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2007)