in Re Damien N. Calhoun

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 19, 2020·No. 10-20-00041-CR·Published

Opinion

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-20-00040-CR No. 10-20-00041-CR

IN RE DAMIEN N. CALHOUN

Original Proceeding

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2MEMORANDUM OPINION

Damien N. Calhoun seeks a writ of mandamus from this Court compelling the trial court to withdraw an order to withhold funds from his inmate account. The procedure necessary to complain about an order to withhold funds from an inmate account was described in Harrell v. State, 286 S.W.3d 315 (Tex. 2009). See In re Buhl, Nos. 10-19-00478-CR, 10-19-00482-CR, 2020 Tex. App. LEXIS 102 (Tex. App. -- Waco Jan. 8, 2020, no pet.). That procedure is to file a motion complaining about the withdrawal order which should be filed with the trial court clerk for the trial court that signed the order. If the trial court then denies the relief requested in the motion, then an appeal, which will be a civil proceeding, can be taken from that denial. There is nothing in the record before us to indicate Calhoun filed a motion in the trial court complaining about the withdrawal order. Because another procedure is available to Calhoun, he is not entitled to relief by mandamus. Accordingly, Calhouns's petitions for writ of mandamus are denied.

JOHN E. NEILL Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Neill Petitions denied Opinion delivered and filed February 19, 2020 [OT06]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Damien N. Calhoun, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

in Re Damien N. Calhoun (in Re Damien N. Calhoun) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harrell v. State
286 S.W.3d 315 (Texas Supreme Court, 2009)