in Re Damien N. Calhoun
This text of in Re Damien N. Calhoun (in Re Damien N. Calhoun) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-20-00040-CR No. 10-20-00041-CR
IN RE DAMIEN N. CALHOUN
Original Proceeding
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2MEMORANDUM OPINION
Damien N. Calhoun seeks a writ of mandamus from this Court compelling the trial court to withdraw an order to withhold funds from his inmate account. The procedure necessary to complain about an order to withhold funds from an inmate account was described in Harrell v. State, 286 S.W.3d 315 (Tex. 2009). See In re Buhl, Nos. 10-19-00478-CR, 10-19-00482-CR, 2020 Tex. App. LEXIS 102 (Tex. App. -- Waco Jan. 8, 2020, no pet.). That procedure is to file a motion complaining about the withdrawal order which should be filed with the trial court clerk for the trial court that signed the order. If the trial court then denies the relief requested in the motion, then an appeal, which will be a civil proceeding, can be taken from that denial. There is nothing in the record before us to indicate Calhoun filed a motion in the trial court complaining about the withdrawal order. Because another procedure is available to Calhoun, he is not entitled to relief by mandamus. Accordingly, Calhouns's petitions for writ of mandamus are denied.
JOHN E. NEILL Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Neill Petitions denied Opinion delivered and filed February 19, 2020 [OT06]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Damien N. Calhoun, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-damien-n-calhoun-texapp-2020.