In re D'Amico

Indiana Supreme Court

In re D'Amico

504 N.E.2d 285, 1987 Ind. LEXIS 848

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 3, 1987

DocketNo. 1175S341

StatusPublished

This text of 504 N.E.2d 285 (In re D'Amico) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re D'Amico, 504 N.E.2d 285, 1987 Ind. LEXIS 848 (Ind. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER OF REINSTATEMENT

Comes now the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission and files “Amended Findings of Fact and Recommendation of the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission” recommending that the petitioner be reinstated to the practice of law.

And this Court, being duly advised, now finds that the requirements of Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 4, have been met and that the Commission’s recommendation should be approved.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Petitioner, William C. D’Amico, be and he here[286]*286by is reinstated as an attorney of the Bar of this Court, effective immediately.

All Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER OF REINSTATEMENT

Comes now the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission and files “Amended Findings of Fact and Recommendation of the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission” recommending that the petitioner be reinstated to the practice of law.

And this Court, being duly advised, now finds that the requirements of Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 4, have been met and that the Commission’s recommendation should be approved.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Petitioner, William C. D’Amico, be and he here[286]*286by is reinstated as an attorney of the Bar of this Court, effective immediately.

All Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

504 N.E.2d 285, 1987 Ind. LEXIS 848, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-damico-ind-1987.