In re D'Amico

Indiana Supreme Court

In re D'Amico

504 N.E.2d 285, 1987 Ind. LEXIS 848

Indiana Supreme Court·Decided March 3, 1987·No. No. 1175S341·Published

Opinion

ORDER OF REINSTATEMENT

Comes now the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission and files “Amended Findings of Fact and Recommendation of the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission” recommending that the petitioner be reinstated to the practice of law.

And this Court, being duly advised, now finds that the requirements of Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 4, have been met and that the Commission’s recommendation should be approved.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Petitioner, William C. D’Amico, be and he here[286] by is reinstated as an attorney of the Bar of this Court, effective immediately.

All Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER OF REINSTATEMENT

Comes now the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission and files “Amended Findings of Fact and Recommendation of the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission” recommending that the petitioner be reinstated to the practice of law.

And this Court, being duly advised, now finds that the requirements of Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 4, have been met and that the Commission’s recommendation should be approved.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Petitioner, William C. D’Amico, be and he here[286] by is reinstated as an attorney of the Bar of this Court, effective immediately.

All Justices concur.

In re D'Amico, 504 N.E.2d 285, 1987 Ind. LEXIS 848 (Ind. 1987).

Pincite

504 N.E.2d 285 (In re D'Amico) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.