In re Damian G.
969 N.E.2d 214, 19 N.Y.3d 841
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, with costs, and petition dismissed. The determinations of neglect against Jacquelyn M. and Christopher G. are not supported by legally sufficient evidence.
Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Damian G., 969 N.E.2d 214, 19 N.Y.3d 841 (N.Y. 2012).
969 N.E.2d 214 (In re Damian G.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matter of Cadence GG.
124 A.D.3d 952 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)