In re Damali B.
586 N.E.2d 57, 78 N.Y.2d 1121, 578 N.Y.S.2d 874, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 4933
This text of 586 N.E.2d 57 (In re Damali B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Damali B., 586 N.E.2d 57, 78 N.Y.2d 1121, 578 N.Y.S.2d 874, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 4933 (N.Y. 1991).
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed as untimely. The prior motion for leave to appeal made to the Appellate Division was untimely (Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals § 101, at 429).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Sumo Container Station, Inc. v. Evans, Orr, Pacelli, Norton & Laffan, P. C.
278 A.D.2d 169 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
586 N.E.2d 57, 78 N.Y.2d 1121, 578 N.Y.S.2d 874, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 4933, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-damali-b-ny-1991.