In re Damali B.

586 N.E.2d 57, 78 N.Y.2d 1121, 578 N.Y.S.2d 874, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 4933
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 26, 1991·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed as untimely. The prior motion for leave to appeal made to the Appellate Division was untimely (Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals § 101, at 429).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Damali B., 586 N.E.2d 57, 78 N.Y.2d 1121, 578 N.Y.S.2d 874, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 4933 (N.Y. 1991).

586 N.E.2d 57 (In re Damali B.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sumo Container Station, Inc. v. Evans, Orr, Pacelli, Norton & Laffan, P. C.
278 A.D.2d 169 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)