In re Dalzelle Monique H.

11 A.D.3d 690, 783 N.Y.S.2d 285, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12544

This text of 11 A.D.3d 690 (In re Dalzelle Monique H.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Dalzelle Monique H., 11 A.D.3d 690, 783 N.Y.S.2d 285, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12544 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

In two related proceedings pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate the mother’s parental rights ón the ground of mental illness, the mother appeals from two orders of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Freeman, J.), both entered January 27, 2003 (one as to each child), which, after a fact-finding hearing, terminated her parental rights and transferred custody and guardianship of the children to the Child Development Support Corp. and the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York for the purpose of adoption.

Ordered that the orders of disposition are affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The testimony of the court-appointed psychologist, based upon his examination of the mother and his review of hospital records and court documents, that the mother suffers from chronic undifferentiated schizophrenia, characterized by hallucinations, delusions, incoherence, and disorganized behavior, and that her condition was not likely to improve in the foreseeable future, [691]*691was uncontroverted. The evidence further established that the mother’s disorder was long-standing, with a history of at least two occurrences of hospitalization, and was compounded by her failure to take medications or submit to treatment. The presentment agency thus met its burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that the mother is unable to properly and adequately care for her children at present or in the foreseeable future (see Social Services Law § 384-b [4] [c]; Matter of Hime Y., 52 NY2d 242 [1981]; Matter of Winston Lloyd D., 7 AD3d 706 [2004]; Matter of Ernesto Thomas A., 5 AD3d 380 [2004]). Santucci, J.P., Adams, Mastro and Spolzino, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Hime Y.
418 N.E.2d 1305 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
In re Ernesto Thomas A. New York Foundling Hospital
5 A.D.3d 380 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
In re Lloyd D.
7 A.D.3d 706 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 A.D.3d 690, 783 N.Y.S.2d 285, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-dalzelle-monique-h-nyappdiv-2004.