In re Daly

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Daly

948 A.2d 157, 195 N.J. 6

DecidedMay 30, 2008

StatusPublished

This text of 948 A.2d 157 (In re Daly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Daly, 948 A.2d 157, 195 N.J. 6 (N.J. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 06-130, concluding that CHARLES BRIAN DALY, a/k/a C. BRIAN DALY, formerly of UNION, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1971, and who has been temporarily suspended from the practice of law pursuant to Rule since February 23, 2005, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence) and RPC 1.4(b) (failure to keep a client reasonably informed about the status of the matter), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that CHARLES BRIAN DALY, a/k/a C. BRIAN DALY, is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 06-130, concluding that CHARLES BRIAN DALY, a/k/a C. BRIAN DALY, formerly of UNION, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1971, and who has been temporarily suspended from the practice of law pursuant to Rule since February 23, 2005, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence) and RPC 1.4(b) (failure to keep a client reasonably informed about the status of the matter), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that CHARLES BRIAN DALY, a/k/a C. BRIAN DALY, is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

948 A.2d 157, 195 N.J. 6, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-daly-nj-2008.