in Re Dalton and Velva McWhinney
This text of in Re Dalton and Velva McWhinney (in Re Dalton and Velva McWhinney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 4, 2008.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-08-01022-CV
IN RE DALTON AND VELVA MCWHINNEY, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On November 4, 2008, relators, Dalton and Velva McWhinney, tendered a petition for writ of mandamus for filing in this court. See Tex. Gov=t Code Ann '22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.1. On November 13, 2008, we returned the petition to relators because it did not comply with Rules 9.3 and 9.4(f) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, and further informed relators that if they did not make the necessary corrections within seven days of the date of the letter, their case would be dismissed. Tex. R. App. P. 9.3 & 9.4(f). Relators have failed to tender a corrected petition to this court.
Accordingly, relators= petition for writ of mandamus is ordered dismissed.
PER CURIAM
Petition Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 4, 2008.
Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Anderson and Frost.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Dalton and Velva McWhinney, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-dalton-and-velva-mcwhinney-texapp-2008.