in Re Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport Board, City of Fort Worth, and City of Dallas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 10, 2012·No. 02-12-00209-CV·Published

Opinion

02-12-209-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00209-CV

In re Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport Board, City of Fort Worth, and City of Dallas

RELATORS

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]

The court has considered relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relief should be denied.  Accordingly, relators’ petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

We have considered “JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.’s Rule 52.11 Motion For Attorneys’ Fees And Expenses.”  The motion is denied.

PER CURIAM

PANEL:  MCCOY, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ.

DELIVERED:  July 10, 2012



[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport Board, City of Fort Worth, and City of Dallas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

in Re Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport Board, City of Fort Worth, and City of Dallas (in Re Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport Board, City of Fort Worth, and City of Dallas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.