In re Dallas Peterbilt, Ltd.

Court of Appeals of Texas

In re Dallas Peterbilt, Ltd.

193 S.W.3d 580, 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 6768, 2005 WL 1995107

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 19, 2005·No. No. 05-05-01034-CV·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Opinion by Justice LANG.

Relator contends the trial judge abused his discretion in denying relator’s plea in abatement and motion to stay proceedings and compel arbitration. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown the trial judge clearly abused his discretion. See Tex.R.App. P. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-44 (Tex.1992) (orig.proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Opinion by Justice LANG.

Relator contends the trial judge abused his discretion in denying relator’s plea in abatement and motion to stay proceedings and compel arbitration. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown the trial judge clearly abused his discretion. See Tex.R.App. P. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-44 (Tex.1992) (orig.proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

In re Dallas Peterbilt, Ltd., 193 S.W.3d 580, 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 6768, 2005 WL 1995107 (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

193 S.W.3d 580 (In re Dallas Peterbilt, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related