In re Dallas Peterbilt, Ltd.
This text of 193 S.W.3d 580 (In re Dallas Peterbilt, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator contends the trial judge abused his discretion in denying relator’s plea in abatement and motion to stay proceedings and compel arbitration. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown the trial judge clearly abused his discretion. See Tex.R.App. P. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-44 (Tex.1992) (orig.proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
193 S.W.3d 580, 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 6768, 2005 WL 1995107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-dallas-peterbilt-ltd-texapp-2005.