In re Dalida P.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Dalida P.

204 A.D.2d 645, 612 N.Y.S.2d 223

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 23, 1994·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

—In two proceedings for the appointment of the paternal aunt of two infant children as their guardian, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Esquirol, J.), dated July 31, 1992, which dismissed the petitions.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the petitions are granted, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Kings County, for entry of appropriate guardianship orders.

In these two uncontested guardianship proceedings, the court dismissed the petitions, finding that the petitioner was not related by blood or marriage to the children. The Family Court opined that an adoption proceeding, rather than a guardianship proceeding, would best serve the interests of the children.

Contrary to the court’s findings, the evidence presented to the court established that the petitioner was the children’s paternal aunt. In any event, SCPA 1703, which is applicable to the instant proceedings (see, Family Ct Act § 661), provides that a guardianship proceeding may be brought by "any person”, and does not require a blood or marriage relationship. Moreover, the court’s suggestion that the petitioner bring an adoption proceeding instead of a guardianship proceeding was clearly an improper basis upon which to dismiss the otherwise proper guardianship petitions that the petitioner was entitled, by law, to file.

The evidence presented to the court in support of the petitions establishes that the interests of the children will be [646]*646promoted by the petitioner’s appointment as their guardian (see, SCPA 1707). Accordingly, the petitions are granted. Sullivan, J. P., Rosenblatt, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In two proceedings for the appointment of the paternal aunt of two infant children as their guardian, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Esquirol, J.), dated July 31, 1992, which dismissed the petitions.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the petitions are granted, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Kings County, for entry of appropriate guardianship orders.

In these two uncontested guardianship proceedings, the court dismissed the petitions, finding that the petitioner was not related by blood or marriage to the children. The Family Court opined that an adoption proceeding, rather than a guardianship proceeding, would best serve the interests of the children.

Contrary to the court’s findings, the evidence presented to the court established that the petitioner was the children’s paternal aunt. In any event, SCPA 1703, which is applicable to the instant proceedings (see, Family Ct Act § 661), provides that a guardianship proceeding may be brought by "any person”, and does not require a blood or marriage relationship. Moreover, the court’s suggestion that the petitioner bring an adoption proceeding instead of a guardianship proceeding was clearly an improper basis upon which to dismiss the otherwise proper guardianship petitions that the petitioner was entitled, by law, to file.

The evidence presented to the court in support of the petitions establishes that the interests of the children will be [646]*646promoted by the petitioner’s appointment as their guardian (see, SCPA 1707). Accordingly, the petitions are granted. Sullivan, J. P., Rosenblatt, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.

In re Dalida P., 204 A.D.2d 645, 612 N.Y.S.2d 223 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

204 A.D.2d 645 (In re Dalida P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related