In re Dais

Fourth Circuit

In re Dais

318 F. App'x 218

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 19, 2009·No. No. 08-2330·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Norman Tyrone Dais petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion to compel. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find there has been no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pau-peris, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Norman Tyrone Dais petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion to compel. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find there has been no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pau-peris, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

In re Dais, 318 F. App'x 218 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

318 F. App'x 218 (In re Dais) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.