In re Dahlberg

Indiana Supreme Court

In re Dahlberg

576 N.E.2d 1256, 1991 WL 167047

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 26, 1991

DocketCause No. 02S00-9101-DI-00008

StatusPublished

This text of 576 N.E.2d 1256 (In re Dahlberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Dahlberg, 576 N.E.2d 1256, 1991 WL 167047 (Ind. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER OF SUSPENSION PENDING FINAL DETERMINATION

Comes now the hearing officer in this case and, pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 14(g), recommends that the respondent, Thomas R. Dahlberg, be suspended from the practice of law pending final determination of this case.

And this Court, being duly advised, now finds that the respondent failed to appear at the scheduled hearing on the Commission's Motion for Suspension Pending Final Determination and failed to show cause why he should not be so suspended. Accordingly, this Court finds that, pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 15, the Hearing Officer's recommendation should be accepted and approved, and the respondent should be suspended pending final determination.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Thomas R. Dahlberg is hereby suspended from the practice of law pending final determination of this case.

All Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER OF SUSPENSION PENDING FINAL DETERMINATION

Comes now the hearing officer in this case and, pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 14(g), recommends that the respondent, Thomas R. Dahlberg, be suspended from the practice of law pending final determination of this case.

And this Court, being duly advised, now finds that the respondent failed to appear at the scheduled hearing on the Commission's Motion for Suspension Pending Final Determination and failed to show cause why he should not be so suspended. Accordingly, this Court finds that, pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 15, the Hearing Officer's recommendation should be accepted and approved, and the respondent should be suspended pending final determination.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Thomas R. Dahlberg is hereby suspended from the practice of law pending final determination of this case.

All Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

576 N.E.2d 1256, 1991 WL 167047, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-dahlberg-ind-1991.