In re Dahlberg

576 N.E.2d 1256, 1991 WL 167047
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided August 26, 1991·No. Cause No. 02S00-9101-DI-00008·Published

Opinion

ORDER OF SUSPENSION PENDING FINAL DETERMINATION

Comes now the hearing officer in this case and, pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 14(g), recommends that the respondent, Thomas R. Dahlberg, be suspended from the practice of law pending final determination of this case.

And this Court, being duly advised, now finds that the respondent failed to appear at the scheduled hearing on the Commission's Motion for Suspension Pending Final Determination and failed to show cause why he should not be so suspended. Accordingly, this Court finds that, pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 15, the Hearing Officer's recommendation should be accepted and approved, and the respondent should be suspended pending final determination.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Thomas R. Dahlberg is hereby suspended from the practice of law pending final determination of this case.

All Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Dahlberg, 576 N.E.2d 1256, 1991 WL 167047 (Ind. 1991).

576 N.E.2d 1256 (In re Dahlberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.