In re Dade

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Dade

609 A.2d 431, 129 N.J. 322, 1992 N.J. LEXIS 1301

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided July 30, 1992·Published

Opinion

[323] ORDER

LEAH D. DADE of PISCATAWAY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1990, having pleaded guilty to second-degree theft by deception in violation of N.J.S.A. 2C:20-4, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that pursuant to Rule l:20-6(b), LEAH D. DADE is temporarily suspended from the practice of law pending the final resolution of ethics proceedings against her, effective immediately and until the further order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that LEAH D. DADE be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of her suspension; and it is further

ORDERED that LEAH D. DADE comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics dealing with suspended attorneys.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[323] ORDER

LEAH D. DADE of PISCATAWAY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1990, having pleaded guilty to second-degree theft by deception in violation of N.J.S.A. 2C:20-4, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that pursuant to Rule l:20-6(b), LEAH D. DADE is temporarily suspended from the practice of law pending the final resolution of ethics proceedings against her, effective immediately and until the further order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that LEAH D. DADE be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of her suspension; and it is further

ORDERED that LEAH D. DADE comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics dealing with suspended attorneys.

In re Dade, 609 A.2d 431, 129 N.J. 322, 1992 N.J. LEXIS 1301 (N.J. 1992).

Pincite

609 A.2d 431 (In re Dade) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.