in Re D. Andrew Klein
This text of in Re D. Andrew Klein (in Re D. Andrew Klein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed February 21, 2019.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-19-00093-CV
IN RE D. ANDREW KLEIN, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 215th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2016-45649
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On February 4, 2019, relator D. Andrew Klein filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, Klein asks this court to compel the Honorable Elaine H. Palmer, presiding judge of the 215th District Court of Harris County, to vacate her January 7, 2019 and January 17, 2019 orders granting Third-Party Defendant Hikmat Ghazal’s motion to abate Klein’s claim against Ghazal. Klein has also filed a motion for temporary relief, asking our court to stay certain orders and proceedings in the trial court. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.10.
Generally, to obtain mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that the relator has no adequate remedy at law, such as an appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding); In re Garza, 544 S.W.3d 836, 840 (Tex. 2018) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam). Klein has not shown that the trial court clearly abused its discretion. We therefore deny Klein’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion for temporary relief.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Wise, Zimmerer, and Spain.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re D. Andrew Klein, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-d-andrew-klein-texapp-2019.