In re Czapelski

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Czapelski

909 A.2d 285, 188 N.J. 479

DecidedNovember 2, 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 909 A.2d 285 (In re Czapelski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Czapelski, 909 A.2d 285, 188 N.J. 479 (N.J. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

LESTER W. CZAPELSKI formerly of LINDEN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1992, and who has been temporarily suspended since August 23, 2003, having tendered his consent to disbarment as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that LESTER W. CZAPELSKI is disbarred by consent, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that he be permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with disbarred attorneys.

[480]*480ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

LESTER W. CZAPELSKI formerly of LINDEN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1992, and who has been temporarily suspended since August 23, 2003, having tendered his consent to disbarment as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that LESTER W. CZAPELSKI is disbarred by consent, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that he be permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with disbarred attorneys.

[480]*480ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

909 A.2d 285, 188 N.J. 479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-czapelski-nj-2006.