In Re Cyclobenzaprine Hydrochloride Extended-Release Capsule Patent Litigation
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
May 1, 2012
ERRATA ______________________
Appeal Nos. 2011-1399, -1409
IN RE CYCLOBENZAPRINE HYDROCHLORIDE EXTENDED- RELEASE CAPSULE PATENT LITIGATION --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EURAND, INC., CEPHALON, INC., and ANESTA AG,
Plaintiffs-Cross Appellants,
v.
MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and MYLAN INC.,
Defendants-Appellants,
and
BARR LABORATORIES, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., and TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD.,
Defendants-Appellees. ______________________
Decided: April 16, 2012 Precedential Opinion ______________________
Please make the following additions:
Page 2, Of counsel on the brief for plaintiff-cross appellant was Tryn T. Stimart, Cooley Godward Kronish LLP, of Washington, DC.
Robert L. Byer, Duane Morris LLP, of Pittsburg, Pennsylvania, for amici curiae Gregory Dolin and Robert C. Kahrl. With him on the brief were Kristina Caggiano and Elese Hanson.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re Cyclobenzaprine Hydrochloride Extended-Release Capsule Patent Litigation (In Re Cyclobenzaprine Hydrochloride Extended-Release Capsule Patent Litigation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.