In Re Cw

784 N.W.2d 204, 486 Mich. 1071
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided July 16, 2010·No. 140841·Published·Cited by 14 cases

Opinion

784 N.W.2d 204 (2010)

In re CW, BW, and DW, Minors.
CW, BW, and DW, Appellees, and
Valeriu Martin and Karen Martin, Petitioners-Appellants,
v.
Department of Human Services, Respondent-Appellee.

Docket No. 140841. COA No. 292866.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

July 16, 2010.

Order

By order of May 12, 2010, respondent Department of Human Services was directed to answer the application for leave to appeal the February 16, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, the motions for extension of time to answer and for leave to file brief amicus curiae are GRANTED. The answer having been received, as well as a statement from the children's lawyer-guardian ad litem, the application for leave to appeal is again considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCR 7.302(H)(1). The parties may file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order, but they should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Cw, 784 N.W.2d 204, 486 Mich. 1071 (Mich. 2010).

784 N.W.2d 204 (In Re Cw) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

20231130_C365110_28_365110.Opn.Pdf
Michigan Court of Appeals, 2023
People of Michigan v. Romante Jomall Adams
Michigan Court of Appeals, 2020
Kirk Charles Herald v. Laurie Marie Rozek
Michigan Court of Appeals, 2019
People of Michigan v. Shautez James Lawson
Michigan Court of Appeals, 2019
Epicurean Developments LLC v. Summit Township
Michigan Court of Appeals, 2017
People of Michigan v. Jahleel Amon Hoskins
Michigan Court of Appeals, 2015
Michael Wenners v. Matthew D Chisolm
Michigan Court of Appeals, 2015
Manoushag Al-Raeis v. Aurora Bank Fsb
Michigan Court of Appeals, 2014