In re Cutchall

574 A.2d 393, 119 N.J. 83, 1989 N.J. LEXIS 1615
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 1, 1989
StatusPublished

This text of 574 A.2d 393 (In re Cutchall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Cutchall, 574 A.2d 393, 119 N.J. 83, 1989 N.J. LEXIS 1615 (N.J. 1989).

Opinion

ORDER

This matter having been presented to the Court on the Disciplinary Review Board’s recommendation that THOMAS T. CUTCHALL be restored to the law, subject to certain conditions; and good cause appearing,

It is ORDERED that THOMAS T. CUTCHALL be restored to the practice of law, effective on approvals by the Office of Attorney Ethics Counsel and the Disciplinary Review Board of a two-year proctorship agreement in accordance with Administrative Guideline No. 28; and it is further

ORDERED that THOMAS T. CUTCHALL’s continued restoration to the practice of law is conditioned on his compliance with the proctorship agreement and on his compliance with a $200 per month payment schedule for administrative costs, the payments to commence with his restoration.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
574 A.2d 393, 119 N.J. 83, 1989 N.J. LEXIS 1615, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-cutchall-nj-1989.