In re Cusimano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Cusimano

241 A.D. 766

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1934

StatusPublished

This text of 241 A.D. 766 (In re Cusimano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Cusimano, 241 A.D. 766 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

[767]*767Order in so far as it vacates order granting leave to sue the receiver and denies the motion for leave to sue reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant, and order granting leave to sue reinstated. The petition upon which the order granting leave to sue the receiver was made is not printed in the record. We assume, however, that sufficient facts were presented to indicate that there was a prima facie case of negligence against the receiver. In such actions all of the facts should be brought out on a trial before there can be a determination as to the liability of a receiver of rents in a foreclosure action who is authorized to make repairs. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[767]*767Order in so far as it vacates order granting leave to sue the receiver and denies the motion for leave to sue reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant, and order granting leave to sue reinstated. The petition upon which the order granting leave to sue the receiver was made is not printed in the record. We assume, however, that sufficient facts were presented to indicate that there was a prima facie case of negligence against the receiver. In such actions all of the facts should be brought out on a trial before there can be a determination as to the liability of a receiver of rents in a foreclosure action who is authorized to make repairs. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

241 A.D. 766, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-cusimano-nyappdiv-1934.