In re Curtis

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In re Curtis

565 S.E.2d 309, 350 S.C. 277, 2002 S.C. LEXIS 183

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided June 17, 2002·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel has filed a petition asking the Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant [278]*278to Rule 17, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, because he has been charged with a serious crime, specifically, possession with intent to distribute cocaine, distribution of cocaine and distribution of cocaine within one-half mile of a school, and because he could pose a substantial threat of serious harm to the public and the administration of justice.

IT IS ORDERED that the petition is granted and respondent is suspended from the practice of law in this State until further order of this Court.

/s/Jean H. Toal, C.J. FOR THE COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel has filed a petition asking the Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant [278]*278to Rule 17, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, because he has been charged with a serious crime, specifically, possession with intent to distribute cocaine, distribution of cocaine and distribution of cocaine within one-half mile of a school, and because he could pose a substantial threat of serious harm to the public and the administration of justice.

IT IS ORDERED that the petition is granted and respondent is suspended from the practice of law in this State until further order of this Court.

/s/Jean H. Toal, C.J. FOR THE COURT

In re Curtis, 565 S.E.2d 309, 350 S.C. 277, 2002 S.C. LEXIS 183 (S.C. 2002).

Pincite

565 S.E.2d 309 (In re Curtis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related