In re Curtis

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Curtis

256 So. 3d 264

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedNovember 14, 2018

DocketNO. 2018-B-1553

StatusPublished

This text of 256 So. 3d 264 (In re Curtis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Curtis, 256 So. 3d 264 (La. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel ("ODC") submitted a joint petition for consent discipline, in which respondent acknowledges that he filed into the court record an affidavit which he knew was improperly notarized. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Larry Curtis, Louisiana Bar Roll number 4678, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months, fully deferred.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty *265days from the date of finality of this court's judgment until paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel ("ODC") submitted a joint petition for consent discipline, in which respondent acknowledges that he filed into the court record an affidavit which he knew was improperly notarized. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Larry Curtis, Louisiana Bar Roll number 4678, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months, fully deferred.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty *265days from the date of finality of this court's judgment until paid.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 So. 3d 264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-curtis-la-2018.