In Re Curtis L. Wrenn, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated

934 F.2d 321, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 21660, 1991 WL 87282
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 29, 1991
Docket91-8106
StatusUnpublished

This text of 934 F.2d 321 (In Re Curtis L. Wrenn, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Curtis L. Wrenn, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, 934 F.2d 321, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 21660, 1991 WL 87282 (4th Cir. 1991).

Opinion

934 F.2d 321
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
In re Curtis L. WRENN, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated, Petitioner.

No. 91-8106.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 6, 1991.
Decided May 29, 1991.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

Curtis L. Wrenn, petitioner pro se.

PETITION DENIED.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, WILKINSON and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Curtis Wrenn brought this petition for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district court to reopen a case which it dismissed in January 1991. He claimed that he did not receive notice of the dismissal in time to file a notice of appeal in compliance with Fed.R.App.P. 4(a).1

A mandamus petition may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In re United Steelworkers, 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir.1979). Further, mandamus relief is not appropriate when there is another remedy available to the petitioner. In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir.1987). Because Wrenn may file a motion for reconsideration in the district court pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b), and because he may not use this petition to avoid the time requirements of Fed.R.App.P. 4(a), we deny the petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the material before the Court and argument would not significantly aid the decisional process.

1

We note that failure to receive notice of an order entered by the clerk does not serve to extend the time in which a notice of appeal may be filed. Fed.R.Civ.P. 77(d)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio-Clc
595 F.2d 958 (Fourth Circuit, 1979)
In Re Diana R. Beard, (Two Cases)
811 F.2d 818 (Fourth Circuit, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
934 F.2d 321, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 21660, 1991 WL 87282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-curtis-l-wrenn-individually-and-on-behalf-of-all-others-similarly-ca4-1991.