in Re: Curtis Holcomb and Donna Holcomb

Court of Appeals of Texas

in Re: Curtis Holcomb and Donna Holcomb

DecidedAugust 28, 2007

Docket14-07-00708-CV

StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Curtis Holcomb and Donna Holcomb (in Re: Curtis Holcomb and Donna Holcomb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

in Re: Curtis Holcomb and Donna Holcomb, (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed August 28, 2007

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed August 28, 2007.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-07-00708-CV

IN RE CURTIS HOLCOMB and DONNA HOLCOMB, Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS, WRIT OF PROHIBITION, WRIT OF INJUNCTION

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On August 27, 2007, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus, writ of prohibition, and writ of injunction in this court. See Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relators ask this court (1) to issue a writ of mandamus compelling the Honorable Mary Nell Crapitto, presiding judge of the County Court at Law No. 1, Galveston County in Cause No. 57,404 (styled Galveston Bleak House Realty, Inc. v. Donald L. Young, et al) to consider and grant a writ of mandamus ordering the setting aside of a judgment rendered against them in Cause No. E07070230 by the Justice of the Peace Court Precinct 7, Galveston County and/or (2) to issue a writ of prohibition or writ of injunction preventing enforcement of the writ of possession issued upon such judgment.

The relators have not identified a basis on which the respondent would be authorized to issue a writ of mandamus to a justice of the peace court. Further, the relators have not shown that prohibiting or enjoining enforcement of the writ of possession is necessary to preserve the jurisdiction of this Court. For these reasons, the relators have not established their entitlement to the extraordinary relief requested. Accordingly, we deny relators= petition for writ of mandamus, writ of prohibition, and writ of injunction.

PER CURIAM

Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed August 28, 2007.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Anderson and Seymore.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed August 28, 2007

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed August 28, 2007.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-07-00708-CV

IN RE CURTIS HOLCOMB and DONNA HOLCOMB, Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS, WRIT OF PROHIBITION, WRIT OF INJUNCTION

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On August 27, 2007, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus, writ of prohibition, and writ of injunction in this court. See Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relators ask this court (1) to issue a writ of mandamus compelling the Honorable Mary Nell Crapitto, presiding judge of the County Court at Law No. 1, Galveston County in Cause No. 57,404 (styled Galveston Bleak House Realty, Inc. v. Donald L. Young, et al) to consider and grant a writ of mandamus ordering the setting aside of a judgment rendered against them in Cause No. E07070230 by the Justice of the Peace Court Precinct 7, Galveston County and/or (2) to issue a writ of prohibition or writ of injunction preventing enforcement of the writ of possession issued upon such judgment.

The relators have not identified a basis on which the respondent would be authorized to issue a writ of mandamus to a justice of the peace court. Further, the relators have not shown that prohibiting or enjoining enforcement of the writ of possession is necessary to preserve the jurisdiction of this Court. For these reasons, the relators have not established their entitlement to the extraordinary relief requested. Accordingly, we deny relators= petition for writ of mandamus, writ of prohibition, and writ of injunction.

PER CURIAM

Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed August 28, 2007.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Anderson and Seymore.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

in Re: Curtis Holcomb and Donna Holcomb, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-curtis-holcomb-and-donna-holcomb-texapp-2007.