In Re Curry

655 S.E.2d 476, 376 S.C. 1, 2007 S.C. LEXIS 418
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided December 12, 2007·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Respondent was suspended on June 11, 2007, for a period of six (6) months. He has now filed an affidavit requesting reinstatement pursuant to Rule 32, of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement contained in Rule 413, SCACR.

*2 The request is granted and he is hereby reinstated to the practice of law in this state.

JEAN H. TOAL, CHIEF JUSTICE.

s/ Daniel E. Shearouse

Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Curry, 655 S.E.2d 476, 376 S.C. 1, 2007 S.C. LEXIS 418 (S.C. 2007).

655 S.E.2d 476 (In Re Curry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Matter of Rogers
654 S.E.2d 835 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2007)