In re Curreri

55 A.3d 63, 212 N.J. 433, 2012 N.J. LEXIS 1144
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 5, 2012·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 12-066, concluding that PAUL JAMES CURRERI of TOTOWA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1987, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.2(d) (assisting client in fraudulent conduct), RPC 1.5(b) (failure to provide written fee agreement), RPC 1.7(a)(concurrent conflict of interest); and RPC 8.4(c)(dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that PAUL JAMES CURRERI is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Curreri, 55 A.3d 63, 212 N.J. 433, 2012 N.J. LEXIS 1144 (N.J. 2012).

55 A.3d 63 (In re Curreri) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.