In re Curle

217 F. 688, 1914 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1542
CourtDistrict Court, N.D. California
DecidedOctober 3, 1914
DocketNo. 7809
StatusPublished

This text of 217 F. 688 (In re Curle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Curle, 217 F. 688, 1914 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1542 (N.D. Cal. 1914).

Opinion

DOOEING, District Judge.

[1] The question as to whether or not a bankrupt is required to attend the hearing upon his application for a discharge having been presented to the court by the referee herein, it is the judgment of the court that the provisions of section 7 of the Bankruptcy Act . require, such attendance, and that the bankrupt may not avoid such attendance by removing from the district.

[2] It is also the opinion of the court that, even if the provision that a bankrupt may not be required to attend at a place more than 150 miles from his home or place of business did apply to a hearing upon an application for discharge, the bankrupt could not avail himself thereof, if pending the bankruptcy proceedings he removed from the district.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
217 F. 688, 1914 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1542, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-curle-cand-1914.