in Re Cuong Anh Van Nguyen
Opinion
Opinion issued June 6, 2013
In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
NO. 01-13-00205-CR ____________
IN RE CUONG ANH VAN NGUYEN, Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Pro se relator Cuong Anh Van Nguyen has petitioned this court for
mandamus relief, naming as respondent John Hawkins, an attorney with the Fort
Bend County District Attorney’s office.* In the petition, relator complains that his
pre-sentencing jail time credit has been inaccurately calculated, and he seeks to
have this calculation corrected.
* The underlying case is State v. Cuong Anh Van Nguyen, Case Number 06-DCR- 044680A, in the 268th District Court of Fort Bend County, Texas. The respondent is John Hawkins, an assistant district attorney in Fort Bend County. Relator’s request does not fall within our mandamus jurisdiction. See TEX.
GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221 (West 2004); In re Praker, No. 01–10–001057–CR,
2011 WL 1326010, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] April 7, 2011, orig.
proceeding). We do not have mandamus jurisdiction against a district attorney
unless necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221;
Praker, 2011 WL 1326010, at *1; see also In re Washington, 7 S.W.3d 181, 182
(Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, orig. proceeding). Because the relief
requested by relator is not necessary to enforce this court’s jurisdiction, we have no
jurisdiction to compel the district attorney to act. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN.
§ 22.221.
We dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus for lack of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Sharp and Massengale.
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Cuong Anh Van Nguyen (in Re Cuong Anh Van Nguyen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.