In re Cunningham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Cunningham

211 A.D.2d 109, 626 N.Y.S.2d 709, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6925

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 28, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 211 A.D.2d 109 (In re Cunningham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Cunningham, 211 A.D.2d 109, 626 N.Y.S.2d 709, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6925 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The above-named attorney was admitted to the practice of law by this Court on June 29, 1976 and is currently in good standing. He has submitted an affidavit resigning from the practice of law in New York State. He states in his affidavit that he last practiced law in New York in 1991 and that his resignation is submitted because he is currently practicing law in California. There are no complaints pending against him.

[110]*110We grant the application and direct that his name be removed from the roll of attorneys.

Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Lawton and Fallon, JJ., concur.

Resignation accepted, and name removed from roll of attorneys.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI