In re Cunningham

578 S.E.2d 892, 276 Ga. 400, 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 1110, 2003 Ga. LEXIS 314
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 27, 2003
DocketS03Y0899
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 578 S.E.2d 892 (In re Cunningham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Cunningham, 578 S.E.2d 892, 276 Ga. 400, 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 1110, 2003 Ga. LEXIS 314 (Ga. 2003).

Opinion

Per curiam.

This disciplinary matter is before the Court on Respondent R. Scott Cunningham’s Petition for Voluntary Discipline, which was filed under Bar Rule 4-227 (b) (2) before a formal complaint was issued. In his petition, Cunningham admits violating Rule 1.15 (II) (b) of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in Bar Rule 4-102 (d). Although a violation of this rule is punishable by disbarment, Cunningham requests the imposition of a twelve-month suspension. The State Bar has no objection to the acceptance of Cunningham’s petition.

Cunningham, who has been a member of the Bar since 1976, admits that during a period of time from November 2000 to June 2001, while holding $2,000 belonging to a client in his attorney trust account, he commingled client funds with his personal funds and permitted the balance of the account to fall below $2,000. Although Cunningham ultimately returned the $2,000 to his client, he admits his conduct violated Rule 1.15 (II) (b) and that, as a result, he is subject to disbarment. In mitigation of his actions Cunningham points out that he has cooperated fully with disciplinary authorities, although we note that he previously received a public reprimand in a prior disciplinary matter in 1993. Under the circumstances, however, we agree with the State Bar that a twelve-month suspension is the appropriate sanction. Accordingly, Cunningham is hereby suspended for a period of twelve months. He is reminded of his duties under Bar Rule 4-219 (c).

Twelve-month suspension.

All the Justices concur. Laura R. Pardo, for Cunningham.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Cunningham
669 S.E.2d 93 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
578 S.E.2d 892, 276 Ga. 400, 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 1110, 2003 Ga. LEXIS 314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-cunningham-ga-2003.