In re Cummings Landau Laundry Machinery Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Cummings Landau Laundry Machinery Co.

264 A.D. 910, 35 N.Y.S.2d 902, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5328

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 3, 1942

StatusPublished

This text of 264 A.D. 910 (In re Cummings Landau Laundry Machinery Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Cummings Landau Laundry Machinery Co., 264 A.D. 910, 35 N.Y.S.2d 902, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5328 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It appears from the order of the Illinois Superior Court, dated May 26, 1942, that petitioner is correct in its contention that the subject of violation of the temporary injunction order was within the scope of the depositions sought. The subpoenas issued will be deemed to permit examination as to matters relevant to such inquiry. The provision for deposit of the books and records with the commissioner will be deemed waived.

The order, so far as appealed from, should be affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. The date for the hearing to proceed to be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

It appears from the order of the Illinois Superior Court, dated May 26, 1942, that petitioner is correct in its contention that the subject of violation of the temporary injunction order was within the scope of the depositions sought. The subpoenas issued will be deemed to permit examination as to matters relevant to such inquiry. The provision for deposit of the books and records with the commissioner will be deemed waived.

The order, so far as appealed from, should be affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. The date for the hearing to proceed to be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

264 A.D. 910, 35 N.Y.S.2d 902, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-cummings-landau-laundry-machinery-co-nyappdiv-1942.