In re: Cummings
This text of In re: Cummings (In re: Cummings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCOT-XX-XXXXXXX 28-AUG-2025 11:37 AM Dkt. 9 ORD
SCOT-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI
IN RE ROSLYN CUMMINGS
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
ORDER (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, Ginoza, and Devens, JJ.)
Upon consideration of the documents filed March 19, 2025,
which the court construes as a petition for writ of mandamus,
petitioner has not demonstrated a clear and indisputable right
to relief, and/or a lack of alternative means to obtain the
relief sought. See Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP v. Kim, 153
Hawaiʻi 307, 319, 537 P.3d 1154, 1166 (2023); Barnett v.
Broderick, 84 Hawaiʻi 109, 111, 929 P.2d 1359, 1361 (1996).
Additionally, the March 19, 2025 document filed at Docket 1
contains what appears to be dates of birth, which constitute
personal information that shall not be included in any
accessible state court document. See Hawaiʻi Court Records Rules 2.19 and 9. This document has been sealed to protect the
personal information.
It is ordered that the petition is denied.
It is further ordered that the appellate clerk shall file a
redacted version of the March 19, 2025 document filed at Docket
1 and Docket 1 shall remain sealed because it contains
confidential personal information. Any member of the public may
file a motion objecting to the sealing.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, August 28, 2025.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza
/s/ Vladimir P. Devens
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In re: Cummings, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-cummings-haw-2025.