In Re Culpepper

32 A.3d 438, 2011 WL 6090096
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided December 8, 2011·No. 11-BG-1071·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the certified order of the Court of Appeals of Maryland disbarring respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction by consent, Attorney Grievance Com’n of Maryland v. Culpepper, 421 Md. 190, 25 A.3d 1023 (2011), this court’s September 19, 2011, order suspending respondent pending further action of the court and directing him to show cause why identical reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline,

ORDERED that Glenn E. Culpepper is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. See In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007), and In re Willingham, 900 A.2d 165 (D.C.2006) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate, including those involving disbarment). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent’s suspension will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C.Bar R. XI, § 14(g).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Culpepper, 32 A.3d 438, 2011 WL 6090096 (D.C. 2011).

32 A.3d 438 (In Re Culpepper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Attorney Grievance v. Culpepper
25 A.3d 1023 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2011)
Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Adams
25 A.3d 1023 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2011)
In Re Fuller
930 A.2d 194 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2007)
In re Willingham
900 A.2d 165 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2006)