Home/New York Supreme Court/In re Cullinan

In re Cullinan

3 Liquor Tax Rep. 56
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Cullinan. Read the opinion of the Court — 39 Misc. 636 →
New York Supreme Court·Decided December 30, 1902·Published

Opinion

Leventritt, J.:

While there are inconsistencies in the statements of the witness called to support the allegations of the petition, they are not so serious or substantial as to discredit his testimony. In the absence of contradiction, the proof calls for 'the cancellation and revocation of the .license. The motion is granted with .$20 costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Cullinan, 3 Liquor Tax Rep. 56 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1902).

3 Liquor Tax Rep. 56 (In re Cullinan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.