In re Cubberly

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Cubberly

753 A.2d 713, 164 N.J. 363, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 675

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 30, 2000·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 98-181 and 98-228, concluding that MARK D. CUBBERLY of TRENTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1984, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), and RPC 1.4(a) (failure to communicate), and good cause appearing;

[364] It is ORDERED that MARK D. CUBBERLY is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 98-181 and 98-228, concluding that MARK D. CUBBERLY of TRENTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1984, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), and RPC 1.4(a) (failure to communicate), and good cause appearing;

[364] It is ORDERED that MARK D. CUBBERLY is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

In re Cubberly, 753 A.2d 713, 164 N.J. 363, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 675 (N.J. 2000).

Pincite

753 A.2d 713 (In re Cubberly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.