In re C.T.

Ohio Supreme Court

In re C.T.

2012 Ohio 5886, 984 N.E.2d 1055, 135 Ohio St. 3d 133

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 14, 2012·No. 2012-0915·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} On September 5, 2012, this discretionary appeal was accepted on propositions of law No. I and II and held for this court’s decisions in State v. Williams, 134 Ohio St.3d 521, 2012-Ohio-5695, 983 N.E.2d 1278, and State v. Sutton, case No. 2012-0098, on appeal from 8th Dist. No. 96408, 2011-Ohio-6270, 2011 WL 6152954, appeal dismissed, 132 Ohio St.3d 1529, 2012-Ohio-4381, 974 N.E.2d 1207.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of State v. Williams.

O’Connor, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents. Kennedy, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} On September 5, 2012, this discretionary appeal was accepted on propositions of law No. I and II and held for this court’s decisions in State v. Williams, 134 Ohio St.3d 521, 2012-Ohio-5695, 983 N.E.2d 1278, and State v. Sutton, case No. 2012-0098, on appeal from 8th Dist. No. 96408, 2011-Ohio-6270, 2011 WL 6152954, appeal dismissed, 132 Ohio St.3d 1529, 2012-Ohio-4381, 974 N.E.2d 1207.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of State v. Williams.

O’Connor, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents. Kennedy, J., not participating.

In re C.T., 2012 Ohio 5886, 984 N.E.2d 1055, 135 Ohio St. 3d 133 (Ohio 2012).

Pincite

2012 Ohio 5886 (In re C.T.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related