In re Cruz

543 S.E.2d 536, 344 S.C. 27, 2001 S.C. LEXIS 36
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedFebruary 23, 2001
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 543 S.E.2d 536 (In re Cruz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Cruz, 543 S.E.2d 536, 344 S.C. 27, 2001 S.C. LEXIS 36 (S.C. 2001).

Opinion

ORDER

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel has filed a petition asking the Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, because he poses a threat of serious harm to the public or the administration of [28]*28justice. The petition also seeks appointment of an attorney to protect the interests of respondent’s clients pursuant to Rule 31, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, and an order freezing respondent’s trust and operating accounts.

IT IS ORDERED that the petition is granted and respondent is suspended from the practice of law in this State until further order of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Charles Baxter Burnette, III, Esquire, is appointed to assume responsibility for respondent’s client files, trust account(s), escrow account(s), operating aecount(s), and any other law office accounts respondent may maintain. Mr. Burnette shall take action as required by Rule 31, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, to protect the interests of respondent’s clients. Mr. Burnette may make disbursements from respondent’s trust account(s), escrow accounts), operating account(s), and any other law office accounts respondent may maintain that are necessary to effectuate this appointment.

This Order, when served on any bank or other financial institution maintaining trust, escrow and/or operating accounts) of respondent, shall serve as an injunction to prevent respondent from making withdrawals from the account(s) and shall further serve as notice to the bank or other financial institution that Charles Baxter Burnette, III, Esquire, has been duly appointed by this Court.

Finally, this Order, when served on any office of the United States Postal Service, shall serve as notice that Charles Baxter Burnette, III, Esquire, has been duly appointed by this Court and has the authority to receive respondent’s mail and the authority to direct that respondent’s mail be delivered to Mr. Burnette’s office.

/s/ James E. Moore, Acting C.J.

FOR THE COURT

TOAL, C.J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Cruz
572 S.E.2d 448 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
543 S.E.2d 536, 344 S.C. 27, 2001 S.C. LEXIS 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-cruz-sc-2001.