In re Crowly

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

In re Crowly

50 F. 465, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1744

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided February 25, 1892·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Lacombe, Circuit Judge.

The decision of the board of appraisers is affirmed, and the court declines to go into the question as to whether they correctly determined that the silk embroidery made the article upon which it was placed dutiable as if it had been embroidered in wool, for the reason that there has been no statement of any error of law or fact complained of, touching such decision, filed in this court, or any application for review thereof in that particular.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lacombe, Circuit Judge.

The decision of the board of appraisers is affirmed, and the court declines to go into the question as to whether they correctly determined that the silk embroidery made the article upon which it was placed dutiable as if it had been embroidered in wool, for the reason that there has been no statement of any error of law or fact complained of, touching such decision, filed in this court, or any application for review thereof in that particular.

In re Crowly, 50 F. 465, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1744 (circtsdny 1892).

Pincite

50 F. 465 (In re Crowly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related