In re Crowly

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

In re Crowly

50 F. 465, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1744

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

DecidedFebruary 25, 1892

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 50 F. 465 (In re Crowly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Crowly, 50 F. 465, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1744 (circtsdny 1892).

Pincite

Opinion

Lacombe, Circuit Judge.

The decision of the board of appraisers is affirmed, and the court declines to go into the question as to whether they correctly determined that the silk embroidery made the article upon which it was placed dutiable as if it had been embroidered in wool, for the reason that there has been no statement of any error of law or fact complained of, touching such decision, filed in this court, or any application for review thereof in that particular.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lacombe, Circuit Judge.

The decision of the board of appraisers is affirmed, and the court declines to go into the question as to whether they correctly determined that the silk embroidery made the article upon which it was placed dutiable as if it had been embroidered in wool, for the reason that there has been no statement of any error of law or fact complained of, touching such decision, filed in this court, or any application for review thereof in that particular.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 F. 465, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1744, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-crowly-circtsdny-1892.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack