In re Crowell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Crowell

256 A.D. 834, 9 N.Y.S.2d 467, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5076

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 23, 1939·Published

Opinion

Appeal from that part of an order appointing substituted trustees which required them to file a bond. Order, in so far as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. The widow and two sons are not the only persons interested in the estate. The sons have vested remainders, subject to be divested in the event of death before the widow. The son of Harlan has a beneficial interest in the estate. Present— Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from that part of an order appointing substituted trustees which required them to file a bond. Order, in so far as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. The widow and two sons are not the only persons interested in the estate. The sons have vested remainders, subject to be divested in the event of death before the widow. The son of Harlan has a beneficial interest in the estate. Present— Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

In re Crowell, 256 A.D. 834, 9 N.Y.S.2d 467, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5076 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

256 A.D. 834 (In re Crowell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.