In re Crow

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In re Crow

411 S.E.2d 426, 306 S.C. 263, 1991 S.C. LEXIS 268

DecidedNovember 4, 1991

StatusPublished

This text of 411 S.E.2d 426 (In re Crow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Crow, 411 S.E.2d 426, 306 S.C. 263, 1991 S.C. LEXIS 268 (S.C. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

CONSENT ORDER

This matter is before the Court upon Petition of the Office of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline asking for an Order Temporarily Suspending the license to practice law of the Respondent, Wade Ronald Crow, pursuant to ¶ 6 of the Rule on Disciplinary Procedure, Rule 413, SCACR.

It appears that the Respondent should be temporarily suspended from the practice of law, and, by consent,

[264]*264It is therefore ordered that Respondent’s license to practice law is temporarily suspended until such time as the Complaint before the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline can be processed to conclusion and until further order of this Court.

It is further ordered that this Order be filed and served, and, in accordance with ¶ 6A of the Rule on Disciplinary Procedure, said Order shall be made public.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CONSENT ORDER

This matter is before the Court upon Petition of the Office of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline asking for an Order Temporarily Suspending the license to practice law of the Respondent, Wade Ronald Crow, pursuant to ¶ 6 of the Rule on Disciplinary Procedure, Rule 413, SCACR.

It appears that the Respondent should be temporarily suspended from the practice of law, and, by consent,

[264]*264It is therefore ordered that Respondent’s license to practice law is temporarily suspended until such time as the Complaint before the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline can be processed to conclusion and until further order of this Court.

It is further ordered that this Order be filed and served, and, in accordance with ¶ 6A of the Rule on Disciplinary Procedure, said Order shall be made public.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

411 S.E.2d 426, 306 S.C. 263, 1991 S.C. LEXIS 268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-crow-sc-1991.