In re Crotty

Indiana Supreme Court

In re Crotty

904 N.E.2d 662, 2009 Ind. LEXIS 363, 2009 WL 1085730

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedApril 10, 2009

DocketNo. 71S00-0812-DI-653

StatusPublished

This text of 904 N.E.2d 662 (In re Crotty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Crotty, 904 N.E.2d 662, 2009 Ind. LEXIS 363, 2009 WL 1085730 (Ind. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PUBLISHED ORDER SUSPENDING RESPONDENT FROM THE PRACTICE OF LAW IN INDIANA FOR NONCOOPERATION

On December 22, 2008, this Court ordered Respondent to show cause why Respondent should not be immediately suspended from the practice of law in this state for failure to respond to the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission's demands for a response to a grievance filed against Respondent. The order required that Respondent show cause in writing within 10 days of service of the order. Respondent has not submitted a response to the Court's order to show cause. On February 6, 2009, the Commission filed a "Request For Ruling And To Tax Costs."

Being duly advised, the Court ORDERS that Respondent be suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately. Pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 28(10)(f)(8), the suspension shall continue until: (1) the Executive Secretary of the Disciplinary Commission certifies to the Court that Respondent has cooperated fully with the investigation; (2) the investigation or any disciplinary proceedings arising from the investigation are disposed of; or (3) until further order of this Court. Respondent is ordered to fulfill the duties of a suspended attorney under Admission and Discipline Rule 23(26).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule that Respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Commission $516.30 for the costs of prosecuting this proceeding.

All Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PUBLISHED ORDER SUSPENDING RESPONDENT FROM THE PRACTICE OF LAW IN INDIANA FOR NONCOOPERATION

On December 22, 2008, this Court ordered Respondent to show cause why Respondent should not be immediately suspended from the practice of law in this state for failure to respond to the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission's demands for a response to a grievance filed against Respondent. The order required that Respondent show cause in writing within 10 days of service of the order. Respondent has not submitted a response to the Court's order to show cause. On February 6, 2009, the Commission filed a "Request For Ruling And To Tax Costs."

Being duly advised, the Court ORDERS that Respondent be suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately. Pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 28(10)(f)(8), the suspension shall continue until: (1) the Executive Secretary of the Disciplinary Commission certifies to the Court that Respondent has cooperated fully with the investigation; (2) the investigation or any disciplinary proceedings arising from the investigation are disposed of; or (3) until further order of this Court. Respondent is ordered to fulfill the duties of a suspended attorney under Admission and Discipline Rule 23(26).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule that Respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Commission $516.30 for the costs of prosecuting this proceeding.

All Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

904 N.E.2d 662, 2009 Ind. LEXIS 363, 2009 WL 1085730, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-crotty-ind-2009.